and some thoughts on Natural History Museum's.
Hands up, this blog is going to be a little self-indulgent
but I wanted to share it with you because I think it’s a fantastic example of
what natural history museums should be doing, and that’s explaining their
history, the history of their collections and the history of those involved in
acquiring those collections.
The Rothschild Room at the Natural History Museum at Tring
was re-opened last year after a period of closure allowing for refurbishment
and I have to admit to being a huge fan. What I love about the room is how it
has taken the history of the museum and its founder, Walter Rothschild, and explained
to the public that history, and the context in which its natural history
collections were assembled throughout the 19th and 20th
centuries.
Panorama of the Rothschild Room at Tring Museum © Elle Larsson |
By showcasing key stories, specimens and individuals in a
highly accessible way, you leave the museum feeling like you’ve learnt a lot
more than you might have just by looking at specimens; because as a passive
observer and at a very basic level, that is all you are really doing when you
visit a natural history museum. They are odd testimonials to a bygone era whose
original public purpose has largely been usurped by television documentaries,
zoological parks and the internet.
Interactive Map showing Rothschild Collectors © Elle Larsson |
The Rothschild room contains a display that tells you about the key
people – Rothschild, his curators and family, as well as important collectors,
who you can find out more information about on an interactive map. There are photo
displays that show family photos and those of the animals Rothschild used to keep, as well as
touchscreens which allow you to look at some of the books produced by those at Tring and
that have since been digitised. It also includes taxidermy specimens to explain
some of Rothschild’s favourite species, artefacts on loan from other
collections and in the middle of the room there is a replica giant tortoise,
similar to the one Rothschild is famously photographed sitting on. It’s been completed
to a really high standard and implements many of the more successful modern
exhibition techniques. It was really refreshing to see the first time and remains
so, hence me choosing to blog about it.
Rothschild Room incorporates specimens and history © Elle Larsson |
I think what really stood out for me though is that this
isn’t an approach that many museums have adopted, particularly the larger
natural history museums. I understand that their purpose is to showcase
biodiversity and that the important scientific work that natural history
museums continue to do is going on behind the scenes, and, showcasing that, as
the Natural History Museum at South Kensington have done in building the
cocoon which allows the public to see into the scientific laboratories is a
good thing and only adds to visitor experience and understanding. They are hugely important and the work being done by them is hugely
significant. I just think there is scope in the public galleries to offer a
stronger narrative, one that perhaps merges science with history, drawing on the extensive historic collections these museums possess and doesn’t
just present a display case of zebras for someone to look at. As it stands we might
learn the Latin name for the species or be able to view them in their taxonomic
groups but what about the process of how and why they ended up there in the
first place? It might be an uncomfortable truth to confront but I think it is
an important one, especially in light of current concerns over conservation.
Digitised family photo albums © Elle Larsson |
I readily admit to having a personal interest in this and
the more I conduct my PhD research the more I realise the people who are working
on natural history collections also have interest in where these specimens
originally came from and how they ended up being in a museum collection – so
why is this not translating into display? There are spectacular stories to be told
and yet they’re not and I think that’s a real shame. It could dramatically
change the way in which people engage with natural history museums and that is
worth exploring in my opinion. There are some exceptions where this is
beginning to be done to a degree. The Horniman Museum and Gardens for example has
an introduction to their natural history gallery where they “set the scene” and
answer some of the key questions or draw attention to key debates - the fur and
feather trade for example and the history of its founder Frederick John
Horniman and how he acquired his collection. So I suppose change is on the
horizon. Perhaps I just need to exercise some patience and hope that in time,
more museums choose to adopt a similar approach to that undertaken by the Tring
Museum in their redesign of the Rothschild Room - it is fantastic and well worth a visit!
One of Rothschild's favourites - take a pic next time you're there! © Elle Larsson |