Portsmouth Historic Dockyard

Being asked to write a specific blog can be a bit difficult as all of a sudden I feel all those eloquent thoughts I might have had shrivel up and turn to mush, almost immediately. Hence, I just tend to write on whatever topic comes into my head that week or in the moment that I sit down to write it. So you can almost imagine my reaction when I was asked to write a blog on H.M.S Victory, or more specifically Portsmouth Historic Dockyard. It went something along the lines of “oh hec, what in the world am I going to write about this place?” Maritime history, lots of school groups and a weird vibe in our friendship group were all I could really remember of it and I got the feeling it had the makings of a one liner – “you should go, it’s a really great day out, especially if the sun is shining!”…… Not my style though is it and it reeks of cynicism.

Thankfully, I’m one of those people who tends to take a lot of pictures on a day out like this and that actually came in very handy when thinking about this review, because those images prompted my memory. The whole complex is steeped in history – you’ve got the ships, various statues, plaques and memorials, museums, workshops and buildings – the Dockyard really does take you on a chronological tour of the British Navy and of British maritime history. That said, we didn’t necessarily adopt that approach in how we went around the site. Turns out we went backwards in time, when I think actually I’d have preferred to go forwards, but that is personal preference and as a visitor you have the freedom to make that decision.

H.M.S Warrior

Our first stop was H.M.S Warrior 1860 and this ship was pretty good for having a good old poke around. “The fastest, largest and most powerful warship in the world when she was launched. Such was her reputation that enemy fleets were intimidated by her obvious supremacy and deterred from attacking Britain at sea – yet she never fired a shot in anger” reads the website (1)”.  In presenting the ship and its history the Dockyard have tried to re-create areas of the ship and show them as they would have been. For example, the cannons are in situ, swords are placed in the holders and the captain’s cabin is furnished. It gave quite an authentic feel, even if those particular items were not necessarily authentic to the ship and the period. This method of display is a technique I tend to be fond of and actually, looking back I think it was done well. There were also some very helpful guides/volunteers aboard to offer information and insight into the history of H.M.S Warrior, which accompanied information panels around deck. And again, from what I can remember, we were actually invited to ask questions. The guides weren’t passive or inanimate to our experience, they wanted to engage with us and I felt the need to find a question to ask just to respond to this eagerness to impart their knowledge.

Aboard H.M.S Warrior

Captain's Cabin H.M.S Warrior

However, that said, having just taken another look at the Portsmouth Historic Dockyard website and the page dedicated to H.M.S. Warrior, I can’t help but feel I failed to take much away from our visit to this ship and that actually, the website has proved to have greater impact. Now I don’t know if this is because of the time that’s lapsed between the visit and actually writing this blog, but reading about how this ship was the “pride of Queen’s Victoria’s Fleet” and how the “combination of iron sides, which offered protection from the exploding shells and the ability to carry large guns, changed the nature of marine warfare” (2), didn’t ring any bells and I can’t say it was something I remember learning on the day; which is a shame because it’s a fact I actually found particularly interesting. I suppose it throws up questions about how effective sites are in educating in the long term. I might well have been engaged at the time, but the retention of information seems a little lacking. Now is that down to me, or the experience I wonder?

H.M.S Victory

Anyway, next stop was H.M.S. Victory and our main reason for going. As the Royal Navy’s most famous warship, and known for her role in the Battle of Trafalgar, H.M.S Victory attracts over 400,000 people a year, most of whom desire to see the spot on deck where Nelson fell. This is marked by a plaque reading, “here Nelson Fell, 21^st October 1805” and again, was something I remember being surprised at on the day. I think my response went something along the lines of “how can they be sure that that is the exact spot?” I’d love to know, so if any readers do, please let me know. I have to admit remembering little else about this ship, which feels like blasphemy, but naval history just isn’t my thing.

"Here Nelson Fell..."

The Mary Rose Museum

You might therefore be wondering, what on earth made me visit if I felt that way. Well, the draw for me had really been the chance to visit the Mary Rose Museum, which had opened in May 2013 and displays both the ship and its artefacts on an unprecedented scale. Costing somewhere in the region of £27 million, the museum retells the story of the Mary Rose, from its crew right through to how it was raised from the bed of Solent back in 1982. It is still experiencing ongoing development, meaning that it is still subject to closures as new work is carried out (as will happen Dec 15 to Summer 2016) but for me, the draw was the fact that while it presents a significant proportion of naval history, it is also hugely significant in terms of marine archaeology and poses important questions about preservation. So it was these bigger, overarching themes that were the real draw for me.

Interactive Screens

The Mary Rose is the only 16^th century warship on display anywhere in the world and you get a clear sense of the unique nature of the ship and its history from the level of care and standard of work that has gone into the exhibition. It felt fresh and modern, but importantly, also attempted to tackle some of the big questions and themes that had remained somewhat hidden from the ships narrative in the past. The dominate image we have of the Mary Rose is as the favourite war ship of Henry VIII, not necessarily as the place of work for a huge crew or for having impact on 16^th Century science. So the fact this museum attempts to readdress that is a great thing.

The galleries themselves make great use of technology and merge modern and traditional museum display techniques together to create an interactive and informative learning environment. For example, there were a number of touch screens where you could select specific artefacts to see them close up and 3-dimensionally, but alongside those enlarged images, there were also video reconstructions to show the items in use. They became animate objects to interactive with and not those merely to be observed. There were also sensory activities, where visitors were encouraged to feel the hammer and chisel marks on a cannon ball for example, or to remove the stop from a jar that once contained menthol and so to get a sense of the smell. There were also eye catching “Did you know” and “Don’t Miss” panels – which enticed the attention of those who might not be as drawn to great lumps of text. I got the impression that the museum had tried to cater for a wide audience, with different learning styles in mind and that was a nice thing to see.

Multi-Sensory Activities

Of course, you are also able to see the wreckage of the Mary Rose and view each of its decks, while the techniques for the preservation of the ship are also explained. (3) The Mary Rose has led to significant developments in the field of conservation, preservation and maritime archaeology that to see it in the flesh is something else. It’s a really special moment when you first lay your eyes on it.

The Mary Rose

I think what has to be my favourite part of the whole museum however, was the emphasis placed on ‘The men of the Mary Rose’ – an attempt to weave real ordinary lives into the narrative of the ship and remind visitors that it was ordinary men who had served aboard and who died when the ship sank. The layout of the museum allows visitors to follow the lives of particular craftsmen aboard ship and answers all sorts of questions about what they might have experienced.

The Men of the Mary Rose

And to do this, the museum has made great use of forensic science.  For example, in the case of the  Carpenter an artist has reconstructed the face of a man found on the orlop deck with a number of woodworking tools next to him; the assumption being that as the carpenter he would have been as close to the action as possible so as to make the necessarily repairs to the ship as soon as possible. They’ve also done a lot of analysis on the skeleton of this individual and are able to inform people about him in more detail, such as that fact that he suffered with arthritis in his spine and ribs. This technique is used for a number of other people employed aboard ship not just the carpenter, and includes the master gunner and surgeon. They’ve attempted, and I’d argue rather successfully, to give visitors an idea of daily life and routine aboard ship, from what you would eat, to “keeping the faith” and what medical treatment you might get if needed. By attempting to put life stories back into the narrative of what happened to the Mary Rose, the museum are telling a largely untold story to a wider audience and I was really impressed by that approach.

Reminding myself of the trip and the history the site has to offer has actually renewed my enthusiasm for it. It has lots to offer visitors and makes the annual pass ticket price worth it. Maritime history might not be my thing, but Portsmouth Historic Dockyard is definitely worth visiting, even just for the Mary Rose Museum.

(1)    http://www.historicdockyard.co.uk/site-attractions/attractions/hms-warrior-1860

(2)    http://www.historicdockyard.co.uk/site-attractions/attractions/hms-warrior-1860

(3)    http://www.maryrose.org/discover-our-collection/

Happy as a pig in muck – Archives, archives and more archives! Part 2

Right, so where was I?

Ah Yes, that’s right, moving on from my little negative rant… After I got a little perspective on the whole situation and had a “that would make a good blog” moment, it was time to hit the next archive and see what else it could reveal in my hunt for new information on Mr Jamrach, to use in both my upcoming talk and exhibition. The great thing this time however, was that I needn’t even leave the comfort of my own home for this archive is all online.

For a reasonable subscription fee members of the public are able to sign up to the British Newspaper Archive (BNA) and access over 400 newspaper titles, spanning from 1710 to the 1960s – an invaluable resource for any researcher, both professional and amateur. I fast became a fan of this archive, for what a fantastic resource it offers its users! It’s easy to use and offers a wealth of material and I’ve really enjoyed navigating my way around and uncovering new little gems. Part of me wants to divulge some of that material, but then again, “spoilers”!

Previously the access I had to online newspaper archives came through the online e-resources access I had the luxury of using as a student at university. The Times Digital Archive and the 19th Century British Library Newspapers were both resources I used a lot when it came to working on both my undergraduate and postgraduate dissertations and had offered up some really interesting snippets of information. However once I’d left university, I lost that access and it forced me to look elsewhere. Hence I rediscovered the BNA, an archive I’d never really thought to utilise before. “Rookie error” I hear you cry!

Launched in 2011, the BNA is a partnership between the British Library and findmypast to digitise up to 40 million pages of the British Library’s vast collection of newspapers, over the course of the next 10 years (1). This enables researchers to search through thousands of articles by keyword, name, location, date or title, and see immediate results. Gone are the days of pain staking scrolling through microfiche and actual hard copies of papers - which can be a nice experience once in a while, but when researching on a large scale this resource is a genius one. And that is actually, exactly why I found myself putting aside a couple of days and dedicating that time to a thorough search of the archive. Before, had I had to do it ‘manually’, I’m not sure whether it would have been worth the time, unless of course I’d known exactly what I was looking for - a specific article or edition – and I think I could quickly have got disheartened with it. But there is no need for that with this archive; you can just explore it without that clear idea. I was able to find new snippets of information I had no previous idea about within seconds, and that made for a really exciting couple of days.

The Site

I found it to be a really user friendly database, offering users different ways to filter the results from announcement types to publication titles, date (YYYY/MM/DD) and even public tags (the sorting of articles into additional categories or topics such as news, classifieds, crime, art etc.). The technology used to recognise search terms also works well at picking out those key words for both basic and advanced searches.  And the character recognition software (OCR) is generally spot on, but some of the transcriptions, especially on the older stuff, can be a bit hit and miss. It does however, appear that the BNA acknowledge this limitation and do offer users the opportunity to correct the OCR errors with the ‘Edit Article Text’ option; therefore offering users a way to improve the quality of the database. How many people have used or will use this feature is, I guess, is open to speculation. Only those articles looked at will have any chance of being corrected, we’d hope correctly but there is no guarantee, and also, how will this be kept on top of as new material continues to be added? There are lots of unanswerable questions here, but I think the approach is definitely one to be commended.  

In terms of the images of the papers, they are of a high quality and are easily manipulated by users – zooming in/out and navigating around the page. It was worth, what I expect, was an extra expense, for the quality of images this resource provides is not always matched by its contemporaries. I have had a few experiences where I’ve viewed some online documents and the images have pixelated when enlarged, or been slow to load when navigating around a page. But like I say, I didn’t experience any of those problems here. Upon viewing an article, your attention is also easily drawn to your original search term, which is highlighted by a blue box around the word and the article tends to be a lighter shade than the rest of the page. This is hugely helpful given that each article appears within the full page view of the original document.

One particularly good aspect to this feature is that fact that it gives you the full context in which the article is appearing. You don’t view it in isolation and this really helps with understanding the article and what else was going on at the time. For example, one of the most well-known stories about Charles Jamrach relates to the escape of a tiger from a shipment, onto the Ratcliffe Highway, where it proceeded to attack a young boy named John Wade, in October 1857. Interestingly, one particular article which documented this event, featured just below another article that discussed Imperial Rule within India subsequent to the Indian Mutiny– and in a way it makes a subtle reference to the symbolism that the event of the escaping tiger evoked.

However, with this feature also comes a slight drawback when it comes to downloading or printing articles. As copies of the entire page view, the PDF’s that are produced are large, complete files, when in actual fact you might only want a small snippet or single article. And, from what I could see, there wasn’t the option to print or download just the single article; a feature I’d particularly liked when using 19th Century British Library Newspapers in the past. So I took to print screening the smaller articles, so as to just get the bit I wanted. Where this wasn’t possible, I did save the large ones but am wondering what I will do as and when I decide to print them. It could be a mammoth cut and paste exercise!

In terms of my own research, what can I say? At first I was really excited to see over 1,800 results bought back for my first search term, but very quickly realised that an article published in a national or regional paper would be published numerous times in smaller, local and provincial papers and so there was a fair bit less to look at than I had first anticipated. But I found this to be interesting in itself and quickly noticed a pattern in terms of which sort of articles were published at various times and also, reused at later dates. As you’d expect, the tale of the tiger featured heavily and appeared in over 300 articles, some of which appeared in the October or November of 1857 but some dated later and covered the court case, when Jamrach was sued by Wade’s parents for compensation, and others just reflected on that incident some 10 or 20 years later. So, just by observing that pattern, I was able to reconfirm how dominate that event was in forming society’s view of Charles Jamrach.

One thing I had been a little concerned about when subscribing to this archive was that there might be a usage cap on how many articles you can view in one session/month. But I did a bit of research and was relieved to find that this doesn’t appear to be the case. I was free to mosey about looking at what I wanted and really enjoyed the process of doing so.

Conclusions

The BNA has really opened up the collections of the British Library to a much wider audience and I think that can only ever be a good thing. In many ways it is democratising research and offering researchers of all kinds, access to an invaluable resource that can be at their fingertips in minutes – although, at a cost. I hope that this is a sign of more good things to come and wonder, whether there is scope for the project to run for longer if funding and resources can be found?

So….I know you’re probably all dying to know – what new gems did I uncover? Well it was a bit of a mixed bag really. Sadly, I discovered news reports dating from the 1870s that describe how Mr. Jamrach, “the well-known dealer in wild beasts” was charged at the Thames Police Court with assaulting his wife. (Whether this was Mr Jamrach Snr or Jnr thought, I have yet to determine). One particular report in the Leeds Times goes on to describe details of the two cases which were put to the court, Mrs. Jamrach’s informing of the violence to which she was inflicted, but then it being implied she was actually having an affair with the character witness and medical examiner in the case. The case for the defense was then put forward and the judge told of the “wretched, miserable life [he suffered] at the hands of the complainant”. In the end the summons was dismissed and the judge ruled that Mrs. Jamrach “keep the peace towards her husband for the next three months”.  Would we expect any other judgment given the time?

Then, there is one other final snippet that I will share with you, which is one that really stood out for me, partly because of its ludicrously, but also because it shows how present Jamrach’s was in the consciousness of society during the later half of the nineteenth century. I was very surprised to find a couple of articles dating from 1888 speculating as to the culprit behind the Whitechapel Murders and that actually implicated Jamrach’s. Having been compared to, or perhaps inspired by, Edgar Allan Poe’s short story “Murder in the Rue Morgue”, it appears it was actually suggested that the Whitechapel crimes were being committed due to the “same agency” as that in the story and that “it might be worthwhile... for the police to inquire at Jamrach’s and other dealers in the White-chapel Road and the neighborhood, if any large monkey has escaped”; while another directly claimed it could be down to “one of Jamrach’s Gorilla’s armed with a knife” (2). I had to laugh. It really does seem that Jamrach managed to get himself caught up in all sorts of new stories of the day! I’d say more, but would like to keep something back for those upcoming events – that’s after all what is has all been in aid of.

(1)    http://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/help/about

(2)    http://poestories.com/read/murders

Happy as a pig in muck – Archives, archives and more archives! Part 1

This week I went very much back to basics and found myself in the archive, both in a physical and digital sense, conducting original primary research. I spent the best part of the week examining documents, some of which were over 200 years old, and loved every single minute of it – well, mostly, but all in good time! There was a sense of urgency in my attempts to plan as many archive visits as possible as I have a couple of big ‘events’ coming up in the next few months and as we all know, early preparation – especially given that I’m starting the PhD in September – is always a good idea! I do slightly feel as if I’ve bitten off more than I can chew, however I do tend to thrive under the pressure and I’m really excited about each of the projects!

So, I started this little research binge at Tower Hamlets Local History Library and Archive which was my first experience of a Borough Archive, unless you equate it to a County archive, then Surrey History Centre would be awarded that accreditation. But I digress. But how did I end up there one might ask? And in fact a couple of people have asked me that very question, as it’s a bit off the beaten track and not the most obvious choice to have made.

Well it was in fact the result of an enquiry placed with the Museum of London Docklands in search of material that might shed further light on the life and business of Charles Jamrach.  As part of my ongoing research I really want to try and figure out which London Docks Jamrach was importing into and whether any manifests survive that might tell us a bit more about the transportation of exotic cargo from ‘source’ to the ‘middle man/distributor’. It was therefore through correspondence with the archivist at the Museum of London Docklands that the suggestion was made that I make enquires with Tower Hamlets Library and Archive, as it was explained to me they hold material that focuses expressly on the Borough of Tower Hamlets. So this is exactly what I did and having received a positive response that they do hold some material, off I went, fortunately on a Saturday which meant no need to take a day of work!

 It transpires that the Archive and Library is open on the 1^st and 3^rd Saturday of the month, which for others in a position like I am is a huge benefit. Generally speaking, most archives tend to run 9-5 hours and so if you’re working, conducting research requires you taking holiday. But not in this case. The discovery of Saturday opening hours, especially in relation to a small and locally funded archive, that I expect only attracts a certain niche of researchers, was therefore a hugely pleasant surprise.

What I found was an archive with a lot of character but one I couldn’t help feel harks back to a bygone age. There was lots of wood cladding and retrograde steel shelfs and I wasn’t overly enthusiastic about the cataloguing system or lack thereof - an online version is coming soon which is fantastic, but as a researcher you are completely dependent on the assistance of the archive staff and of course, they can’t always know what you are looking for, because half the time you don’t really know until you find it!

I suppose I’ve been very spoilt in what I’ve experienced in other archives before now, as they’ve tended to be the larger, well-funded ones. For example, I am used to drawing up a list with reference numbers of what I’d like to see before I turn up, or the very least will have arranged this with an archivist beforehand. However that didn’t happen in this case. I was just told to turn up but then when I arrived, I was asked to provide references – catch 22. There is also a further complication which has arisen through subsequent correspondence because referencing on the original material isn’t particularly clear and it’s therefore been difficult for me to supply an accurate reference number for an item I’ve requested a copy of.

I feel pretty useless being so vague about it, as it’s normally something I am very particular about. I want to be able to go back to the original material and re-source what I found, but I also want others to be able to do the same thing if and when they need to – to both corroborate and question my work. And this was also made difficult by the fact that in a number of cases, the material I was looking consisted of newspaper clippings, cut out from the original newspapers and merely stuck to pieces of card, not necessarily with their provenance labelled anywhere. I found this all quite prohibiting as a researcher, so while I may have found some great material, and some pictures I’m very pleased to have found (we now have a face for the name for example), I’m a little hesitant to use them, as I’m not entirely sure where they’ve come from - at least not at the moment. All in all, it felt a little haphazard if I’m honest, but, on a positive note we did get there in the end and the archivist was very helpful in producing a lot more material that I had anticipated being available, so all in all it was a very beneficial visit and I left on a bit of a high it has to be said.

I also had my first microfiche experience at Tower Hamlets Archive which was simply terrifying. Never having used it before I did ask for a tutorial, which the archivist was very happy to provide, but the whole process still scared the life out of me and I had horrible visions of pushing the button too fast and the film bursting into flames and being lost forever. I’m not sure I’d race to use it again – I’d much rather stick to digital archives or those with pages I can turn!

So high on the success from earlier in the week I then headed off to another, arguably more well-known and well used archive, where I spent the next two days. The first day was brilliant. I was very impressed with the archive, the organisation and the staff who were very friendly and accommodating and who helped to create a really nice environment in which to work. As sometimes happens, the material was not all relevant or what I had been hoping to find, but I did find a few nice surprises and had a bit of a refresher in reading 19^th century italicised handwriting. It felt really good to be back in the archive, in a more traditional sense – it had been too long, so all in all I had a really nice and productive day.

However, the second day, or rather, the last half an hour of that second day, was a completely different story. When it hit shift change we ended up with a bit of a jobsworth on the desk and I left feeling completely enraged. The demeanour of that particular archivist is exactly what can put ordinary members of the public off going to archives and what helps to preserve the image that archives are only for the use of the ‘elite’ and members of the ‘academy’. This particular archivist didn’t attempt to educate, but reprimanded in quite an unpleasant tone. Hands up, my original set up wasn’t as it should be, I did have part of the file (a corner) hanging over the edge of the desk, and rightly so she told me to place it more centrally on the desk – fine, I don’t have a problem with that. What I do have a problem with is her both doing it for me and the tone that she adopted. Teach me, don’t lecture me.

But the second thing that also really got me was being told that I couldn’t hold up the documents or angle them ever so slightly in an attempt to decipher, what is quite difficult handwriting to read. I am a historian. I appreciate that documents are fragile and I didn’t take the decision to lift that particular document lightly. Had it been fragile, or tearing or weak in any way I wouldn’t have chosen to look it at that way. I assessed what was in front of me and reacted suitably. And I think that particular archivist needs to appreciate that. As visitors to the archive, we’re not all inferior because we don’t hold the title of archivist.

Documents like those I had been viewing, have been kept to be studied and that’s all I was doing. There was no man handling, just holding it lightly at different angles – and the insistence that they could offer a magnifying glass, I’m afraid, wasn’t go to make that task any easier. The size of the text wasn’t the issue, but had I been asked rather than pre-judged, I might have been able to explain that.

I know archives have rules and guidelines for a reason, but I also think the value in their existence is the use people are able to make of them. Provided people are respectful and careful with the material they handle, we shouldn’t be reprimanded for how we hold a document. It’s a bit backward and old fashioned for my liking - I wouldn’t be surprised if this same archivist favoured the white glove approach as well!

Just why I’m on my soapbox - this particular individual even prohibited a visitor taking a picture of the library. Not specific items or artefacts, just the room as an entity. I mean come on?! Archives shouldn’t be closeted, mysterious entities shut off from the world. They can offer so much, but people need to know they are there in the first place. If anything, that’s what I took most from my experience of Tower Hamlets Archive. I needed to know it was there before it could be of any use to me and what use it was?! The whole thing just really grated on me – especially as it didn’t appear to be the archives’ ethos, just the ethos of that particular archivist.

I can’t help but think, if I felt intimidated having used numerous archives in the past, how would someone inexperienced feel? It really would be enough to put some people off and it continues to promote this elitist approach to archival study and that is something I really resent. I think so many organisations have come so far in accepting ‘modern’ historical practice and in welcoming those from outside the academy, but some and some individuals, have yet to catch up with that philosophy. So yes, you could say that particular archivist put a right downer on the day.

To be continued…